Temporal expression in nominals: tripartite deictics in the Bulgarian Rhodope dialects
Summary
Excerpt
Table Of Contents
- Cover
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- About the author
- About the book
- Citability of the eBook
- Contents
- List of abbreviations
- Glosses
- Note about glosses, examples and translations
- Localities (Bulgaria)
- Interviewers
- List of maps
- List of figures
- List of tables
- 0. Introduction
- 1. Temporal interpretation and time reference
- 1.1 Tense in Nominals. Introduction
- 1.2 Interaction between nominal tense and verbal tense
- 2. Definiteness in Bulgarian standard language and dialects
- 2.1 Tripartite definite articles in Bulgarian dialects
- 2.2 Tripartite definite articles in the Central Rhodope dialect
- 2.3 Spatial distance
- 2.4 Tripartite determination in Balkan Slavic
- 2.4.1 Deixis and determination in Pomak (Greece): an overview
- 2.4.2 Sit2 = Sit0, spatial uses
- 2.4.3 Sit2 ≠ Sit0, temporal uses
- 2.4.4 Evidentiality: interaction between the noun phrase and the verb phrase
- 2.5 Origin of evidential semantics: diachronic perspective
- 2.6 Other temporal uses of deictics in the noun phrase
- 3. Research methods and tools
- 3.1 Bulgarian dialects classification
- 3.2 Corpus I: first-hand data
- 3.3 Corpus II: ‘Bulgarian dialectology as Living Tradition’ project
- 3.4 Corpus III: digital archive of documents about the Rhodope region
- 4. Corpora analysis: deictic functions in the Rhodope dialects
- 4.1 Quantitative data analysis
- 4.2 Identifying a hierarchical model of deictic functions
- 4.3 Word classes and deictic spatio-temporal markers on nouns
- 4.3.1 Food artifacts
- 4.3.2 Human beings and kinship
- 4.3.3 Geographical names and places
- 4.3.4 Animals and objects
- 4.4 Spatial uses as a basic value
- 4.4.1 Movement from/to place. Distance in location
- 4.4.2 Prepositions of place
- 4.5 The possessive meaning in the deictic markers
- 5. Interaction between nominal tense and verbal tense in the Rhodope dialect
- 5.1 Present tense and the -s deictic
- 5.2 Praesens historicum and temporal markers in the nominal phrase
- 5.3 Resultative perfect in combination with the deictic forms
- 5.4 Past in nominals and temporal markedness on nouns
- 5.5 The habitual meaning and the -n deictic
- 5.6 Expressing evidentiality in nominals59
- 5.7 Temporal subordinators in combination with deictic forms
- 5.8 Future and deictic markers
- 5.9 Summary of temporal markers in the noun phrase
- 6. Conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- Bibliography
- Appendices
- Corpus I
- Corpus II
- Corpus III–Note on Bulgarian phonetic transcription of dialects
- (I) Popkonstantinov 1889, about tripartite definite forms in Petkovo.
- (II) Šiškov 1907, about tripartite pronouns in Ahăčelebijski pomak.
- (III) Transcription of dialectological material by Kanevska-Nikolova, 2006, extract from the village Momčilovci (Kanevska-Nikolova 2006: 234).
- (IV) Transcription of dialectological material from Rhodope dialect by Ljubomir Miletič, 1912: 155 and translated edition 2013: 173.
- (V) Notes by Stojko Stojkov about object doubling in Bulgarian dialects (Stojkov 1962: 261)
The glosses are inspired, but they do not perfectly match, from the Leipzig Glossing Rules of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Linguistics. I took the liberty to change some of them to fit better with the aim of this work.
1 |
first person |
2 |
second person |
3 |
third person |
A |
addressee’s sphere |
ACC |
accusative |
ADJ |
adjective |
ADV |
adverb(ial) |
AFF |
affix |
ANIM |
animate |
AOR |
aorist |
AUX |
auxiliary |
CL |
clitic |
D |
distal |
DAT |
dative |
DEF |
definite |
DEM |
demonstrative |
DET |
determiner |
DIST |
distal |
DO |
direct object |
DU |
dual |
EVID |
evidential |
F |
feminine |
FUT |
future |
GEN |
genitive |
HAB |
habitual |
IMP |
imperative |
IMPF |
imperfect |
IND |
indicative |
INDF |
indefinite |
INF |
infinitive |
INSTR |
instrumental |
IPVF |
imperfective |
IRR |
irrealis |
M |
masculine |
N |
neuter |
N- |
non- (e.g. non-feminine) |
NEG |
negative |
NMZR |
nominalizer |
OBJ |
object |
POSS |
possessive |
PFV |
perfective |
PL |
plural |
PRF |
perfect |
PRON (PR) |
pronoun |
PRS |
present |
PST |
past |
PTCP |
participle |
REFL |
reflexive |
REL |
relative |
REM.P.REP |
remote past reported |
S |
speaker’s sphere |
SBJ |
subject |
SG |
singular |
TOP.NON.A/S |
topical nonsubject |
VOC |
vocative |
Note about glosses, examples and translations
– morpheme boundary
-s suffix
-s- infix
s- prefix
-ø zero marker or zero morpheme (e.g. zero article)
AOR.3SG the dot separates two (or more) grammatical categories on the same morpheme or root
[…] the utterance continues or is an excerpt of a longer context
deteno, deteno–the comma stays for a short pause
deteno. deteno–the dot stays for a long pause
*the asterisk indicates ungrammaticality
‘inverted commas’ are used for translations
“double quotes” are used for direct speech
Arda |
Ar |
Čokmanovo |
Čo |
Gela |
Ge |
Gorna Arda |
GAr |
Gozdevica |
Goz |
Gradăt |
Gr |
Koren |
Kor |
Košnica |
Ko |
Krivo Pole |
KrPo |
Leštak |
Le |
Malevo (Haskovo) |
MaHa |
Mandra |
Man |
Mogilica |
Mo |
Momčilovci |
Mom |
Oryahovec |
Or |
Sărnica |
Săr |
Stikăl |
St |
Sveta Petka |
SvPe |
Šumnatica |
Šu |
Tihomir |
Ti |
Tikale |
Tik |
Vărbina |
Văr |
DF |
Davide Fanciullo |
EA |
Evangelia Adamou |
EKN |
Elena Kanevska-Nikolova |
GK |
Georgi Kolev |
KP |
Kamen Petrov |
MM |
Maksim Mladenov |
PŠ |
Petăr Šiškov |
RA |
Ronelle Alexander |
VŽ |
Vladimir Žobov |
Map 3: Map № 8 in Stojkov (1962: 416). Classification of Bulgarian dialects
Map 4: Rhodope mountains area in Bulgaria
Map 6: Geolocation of Example group 1, Central Rhodope mountains dialect, Bulgaria
Fig. 1: Simultaneous location of Located Situation and Reference Time (Haspelmath 1997: 32)
Fig. 2: Anterior location of Located Situation with respect to Reference Time (Haspelmath 1997: 35)
Fig. 3: Posterior location of Located Situation with respect to Reference Time (Haspelmath 1997: 35)
Fig. 4: Age distribution of the informants of Corpus I and II
Fig. 5: Total distribution of the three deictic forms in the corpus
Fig. 6: Distribution of the three deictic forms according to age groups
Fig. 7: Distribution of -s, -t and -n morphemes in age groups in village Arda
Details
- Pages
- 208
- Publication Year
- 2019
- ISBN (PDF)
- 9783631790571
- ISBN (ePUB)
- 9783631790588
- ISBN (MOBI)
- 9783631790595
- ISBN (Hardcover)
- 9783631781760
- DOI
- 10.3726/b15767
- Language
- English
- Publication date
- 2019 (June)
- Keywords
- Deixis Definite articles Tensed nominals Definiteness Corpus linguistics Balkan Slavic
- Published
- Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warszawa, Wien, 2019. 206 pp., 9 fig. b/w, 9 tables, 8 maps
- Product Safety
- Peter Lang Group AG