Linguistic Change in Galway City English
A Variationist Sociolinguistic Study of (th) and (dh) in Urban Western Irish English
Summary
Excerpt
Table Of Contents
- Cover
- Title
- Copyright
- About the Author
- About the Book
- This eBook can be cited
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- 1. Introduction
- 1.1 Sociolinguistic methods
- 1.1.1 Variationist sociolinguistics, dialectology, and urban dialectology
- 1.1.2 Core variables and concepts of research on language variation and change
- 1.1.2.1 Age cohorts / age groups / generations
- 1.1.2.2 Sex and gender
- 1.1.2.3 Social class, social stratification, and socioeconomic scores
- 1.1.2.4 The vernacular and the Observer’s Paradox
- 1.1.2.5 Linguistic style
- 1.1.2.6 Speech communities, communities of practice, social networks and discourse communities
- 1.2 Research aims
- 1.3 Structure of the study
- 2. Galway as social and linguistic area
- 2.1 The city of Galway
- 2.2 Population
- 2.3 Socioeconomic, ethnic and linguistic characteristics of evolving Galway
- 2.3.1 Old Galway
- 2.3.2 Early Modern Galway
- 2.3.3 Modern Galway
- 2.4 Diachronic development of linguistic communities in and around Galway
- 2.4.1 An Cladach/Claddagh
- 2.4.2 Mionlach/Menlough/Menlo
- 2.4.3 An Bóthar Mór/Bohermore
- 2.4.4 An Fhaiche Mhór/Eyre Square
- 2.4.5 Barr an Cáladh/Woodquay and Newtownsmith
- 2.4.6 The old ‘west suburb’: Dominick Street
- 2.4.7 Bóthar na Trá/Salthill
- 2.4.8 An Baile Bán/Ballybane, Radharc na Mara/Mervue and Seantalamh/Shantalla
- 2.5 Implications
- 3. Galway City English as a variety of Irish English
- 3.1 A feature-based approach to Irish English
- 3.2 Irish English and three waves of sociolinguistics
- 3.2.1 Milroy and Milroy (1978): Belfast
- 3.2.2 Harris (1985): Belfast
- 3.2.3 McCafferty (2001): (London)Derry
- 3.2.4 Collins (1997): Claddagh, Galway City
- 3.2.5 Sell (2009 and 2012): Galway City
- 3.2.6 Peters (2012 and 2013): An Bóthar Mór/Bohermore, Galway City
- 3.2.7 Bertz (1975, 1987), Hickey (2005), and Lonergan (2013): Dublin
- 3.2.8 Implications
- 3.3 English in Galway City, Connacht, and Ireland’s West
- 3.3.1 Vowel features of Galway City English
- 3.3.1.1 /ε/-raising (PEN/PIN merger)
- 3.3.1.2 Final [ə] or [əi] in HAPPY
- 3.3.1.3 Diphthongisation in GOAT/HOME and FACE/NAME
- 3.3.1.4 PRICE and MOUTH
- 3.3.1.5 START
- 3.3.1.6 THOUGHT, LOT, CHOICE
- 3.3.1.7 STRUT
- 3.3.1.8 Schwa epenthesis
- 3.3.2 Consonantal features of Galway City English
- 3.3.2.1 /s/-palatalisation, /v/-/w/ interchange and /hw/-velarisation
- 3.3.2.2 THIN, FAITH and THEN, BREATHE
- 3.4 Dental fricatives in Irish English
- 3.4.1 Variants of (th) and (dh)
- 3.4.2 Patterns of distribution
- 3.5 Implications
- 4. Methods of data collection and analysis
- 4.1 Fieldwork
- 4.2 Sampling method
- 4.2.1 Apparent-time method
- 4.2.2 Stratified random sampling, snowball sampling and participant observation
- 4.3 Data collection and interview design
- 4.4 The informants
- 4.4.1 Age and sex
- 4.4.2 Socioeconomic index scores
- 4.5 The corpus
- 4.6 Research ethics and subject anonymity
- 4.7 Univariate, bivariate and trivariate analysis
- 4.8 Subset of data for variation analysis
- 4.9 Factor groups and coding
- 4.10 Phonetic analysis
- 4.11 Summary
- 5. Analysis of (th, dh)-variability in Galway City English
- 5.1 The variables (th) and (dh) in the CGCSE
- 5.2 Distribution of variants of (th) and (dh) in the subset of data
- 5.2.1 Linguistic factors
- 5.2.1.1 Position in word
- 5.2.1.2 Number of syllables
- 5.2.1.3 Position in syllable
- 5.2.1.4 Word stress
- 5.2.1.5 Preceding phonological environment
- 5.2.1.6 Following phonological environment
- 5.2.1.7 Word class and part of speech
- 5.2.1.8 Linguistic factors: summary of findings
- 5.2.2 Social factors
- 5.2.2.1 Factor ‘age’
- 5.2.2.2 Factor ‘sex’
- 5.2.2.3 Factors ‘sex’ and ‘age’
- 5.2.2.4 Factor ‘socioeconomic group’
- 5.2.2.5 Factors ‘socioeconomic group’ and ‘age’
- 5.2.2.6 Factors ‘socioeconomic group’, ‘age’ and ‘sex’
- 5.2.2.7 Factor ‘neighbourhood’
- 5.2.2.8 Social factors: summary of findings
- 6. Discussion and conclusions
- 6.1 Research aims and methodology revisited
- 6.2 Results and implications
- 6.3 Limitations and future research
- Appendix I: Coding scheme
- Appendix II: Samples from the coded data
- Appendix III: Sample transcript from the CGCSE
- References
- Index
- Series Index
Table 1. Suggested and/or substantiated vowel features of Galway City English
Table 2. Suggested and/or substantiated consonant features of Galway City English
Table 3. Mobility patterns of individual speakers
Table 5. Index of employment/occupation
Table 6. Social characteristics of the informants
Table 7. Realisation of the variants of (th, dh)
Table 8. Variants of (th, dh) in monosyllabic and polysyllabic words
Table 10. Variants of (th, dh) in initial and final position in syllables of polysyllabic words
Table 11. Variants of (th, dh) in stressed and unstressed words
Table 12. Frequencies of variants of (th, dh) when preceded by different classes of sounds
Table 13. Frequencies of variants of (th, dh) when followed by different classes of sounds
Table 14. Word class and the variants of (th, dh)
Table 15. Word class and the variants of (th) and (dh)
Table 16. The variants of (th, dh) in different parts of speech (as % of N)
Table 17. Linguistic constraints on variants of (th, dh) summarised
Table 18. The five age groups and the variants of (th, dh)
Table 19. Females and males and the variants of (th, dh)
Table 20. The socioeconomic index scores and the variants of (th, dh) ← xiii | xiv →
Table 21. The stratification of the fricative variants by socioeconomic class, age group, and sex
Table 22. The stratification of the dental plosive variants by socioecon. class, age group, and sex
Table 24. The stratification of the affricate variants by socioeconomic class, age group, and sex
Table 25. Social constraints on variants of (th, dh) ordered by weight of combination of categories ← xiv | xv →
Figure 1. The City of Galway and its neighbourhoods/districts in 2014
Figure 2. Population growth in Galway between 1498 and 2025
Figure 3. Medieval Galway. Adapted from Mannion (2012: 49)
Figure 4. Pictorial map of Galway 1651. Adopted from Mannion (2012: 52)
Figure 5. Logan Map of Galway 1818. Adapted from Mannion (2012: 54)
Figure 12. Map of Dominick Street and Claddagh village 1651 (O’Dowd 1985: 39)
Figure 13. Layout of Menlo Village, 1838. Adapted from Mannion (2012: 60)
Figure 14. Map of Bohermore and Eyre Square in 1651 (O’Dowd 1985: 43)
Figure 15. Map of Woodquay and Newtownsmith in 1651 (O’Dowd 1985: 40) ← xv | xvi →
Figure 18. Spectrogram of alveolar [d] in “as a daily”, produced by the same speaker
Figure 21. Waveform and spectrogram of alveolar [t] in “maybe three”, produced by the same speaker
Figure 22. Waveform and spectrogram of affricate [tʃ] in “one tree”, produced by the same speaker
Figure 26. Frequency of variants of (dh) and (th) in the coded tokens (N=4,053)
Figure 29. Frequency of variants of (dh) and (th) per word class
Figure 30. Frequency of the various parts of speech in the dataset (as % of total) ← xvi | xvii →
Details
- Pages
- XXII, 224
- Publication Year
- 2016
- ISBN (PDF)
- 9783653066395
- ISBN (MOBI)
- 9783653951448
- ISBN (ePUB)
- 9783653951455
- ISBN (Hardcover)
- 9783631671788
- DOI
- 10.3726/978-3-653-06639-5
- Language
- English
- Publication date
- 2016 (June)
- Keywords
- dental fricatives urban dialectology multivariate analysis corpus linguistics
- Published
- Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, 2016. XXII, 224 pp., 25 tables, 40 graphs
- Product Safety
- Peter Lang Group AG