Loading...

Enhancing Teaching Practice in Higher Education

International Perspectives on Academic Teaching and Learning

by Beatrix Kress (Volume editor) Holger Kusse (Volume editor)
Edited Collection 232 Pages

Summary

The ENTEP Project, funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union, has been initiated with the aim of improving the quality of education and teaching, enhancing teaching practices and further developing educational science in Russia and China. This book contains the results of this project. It unites general considerations with regard to the establishment of a general teaching and learning policy on the organizational level and more detailed reflections on teaching and learning, especially in times of digital education. Due to the international setting of the project, the volume delivers an insight into very different approaches, i. a. Italy, Great Britain, Portugal, Germany, and in particular Russia and China.

Table Of Contents

  • Cover
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • About the editors
  • About the book
  • This eBook can be cited
  • Table of Contents
  • Enhancing Teaching Practices in Higher Education – Introduction (Beatrix Kress, Holger Kusse)
  • Written and Oral Communication as a Didactical Tool and the Relevance of Academic Genres in the Digital Space (Kathrin Schweiger, Beatrix Kress)
  • Intercultural Teaching and Learning in Foreign Language Education. Using the Example of Teaching Russian (Holger Kusse)
  • Perspectives of Authentic Assessment and Professional Practice Interventions in Teaching and Learning in UK Higher Education (Maureen Royce, Madeleine Stevens, Joshi Jariwala, David Soehren)
  • The Innovation of Learning and Teaching Practices in Higher Education: A Methodological Focus on the University of Bologna’s Model. (Aurora Ricci)
  • Contentualizing Students’ Motivation in Online Language Courses (Olga Mennecke)
  • New Prospects in Higher Education: Hybrid Learning Environments and Creative Teaching (Susana Gonçalves)
  • Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Modern Management Technologies in Higher Education as Knowledge-Intensive Activity (Irina Pervukhina, Marina Vidrevich, Natalia Vlasova)
  • Transformation from Conventional Methods to Web-based Technologies: Enhancing FLT/ FLL Practices in Russian Universities (Tatiana Tregubova, Irina Ainoutdinova, Vadim Kozlov)
  • Enhancing Teaching Practice in HEIs through the Development of University Learning and Teaching Strategy (Sergei Vasin, Konstantin Korolev, Tatiana Razuvaeva)
  • Improving Teaching Practice in Higher Education from the Perspective of Learning Science (Juan Fu)
  • Effective Ways of Integrating Moral Education into College English Teaching (Tang Xueming)
  • The Present Situation, Dilemma and Path of Internationalization of Higher Education in Central Region of China – Taking S University as an Example (Qin Yuan, Yigang Peng)
  • Series Index

←6 | 7→
Beatrix Kress, Holger Kusse

Enhancing Teaching Practices in Higher Education – Introduction

With the eponymous project for this book – ENTEP: Enhancing Teaching Practices in Higher Education in Russia and China – a highly interesting, sometimes rough, always exciting journey began in 2018. The focus of the project, on improving education and teaching in higher education, implies two prerequisites: That there are special teaching practices in higher education, which differ from other institutional settings, and that there are different ways of teaching and learning in higher education, depending on the cultural setting of the institution. What we have seen and learned through this project is the importance of a reciprocal understanding of the notions, assumptions and methods not only of higher education, but of science as a whole. Only a holistic approach is able to improve teaching practices, as they are embedded into a social, cultural and institutional handling of science, learning and teaching. Furthermore, a project like this one can only work on the basis of reciprocity: Improving practices means also learning from existing practices, bearing in mind not only the aforementioned differences, but also the common and uniting aspects of academia.

The present book represents this approach and the journey we made through this project. It documents strategies and policies in science, as well as political and scientific understandings of higher education and specific associated measures. Over the project’s lifetime, it became apparent that the expectations with regard to higher education didactics in the various traditions and in the higher education policy contexts of the project partners are in some ways quite different. This pertains to methodological questions, but the social and moral tasks assigned to didactics, independent of a specific subject, are of concern as well. We have seen that the cultural (and therefore the normative, ideational and political) background interferes with the general concept and comprehension of education and science. A crucial event during the project, however, was the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, which led to a shift in the project’s research interests towards questions of digital teaching and learning. This is also reflected in the present volume through four contributions devoted to this subject, though we have decided to structure the present volume not by topic. We still see the local and cultural aspects as the unifying factor and have therefore arranged the contributions by area.

←7 | 8→We begin with different inputs from Germany, Great Britain, Italy and Portugal. The contribution from Kathrin Schweiger and Beatrix Kress, Written and Oral Communication as a Didactical Tool and the Relevance of Academic Genres in the Digital Space, combines an overview of the two different forms of communication – the written and the spoken word – with the didactical expectations and the influence of all the changes caused by the digitalization of higher education during the pandemic.

In Holger Kusse’s contribution, Intercultural Teaching and Learning in Foreign Language Education. Using the Example of Teaching Russian, language learning is considered from an intercultural point of view. The different factors, influences and challenges of intercultural didactics in foreign language teaching are discussed. At the end, Kusse reflects on these considerations against the background of this specific project, which makes theoretical assumptions applicable.

Maureen Royce, Madeleine Stevens, Joshi Jariwala and David Soehren discuss in their contribution, Perspectives of Authentic Assessment and Professional Practice Interventions in Teaching and Learning in UK Higher Education, the general principles of curriculum development and assessment, considering the requirements of professional practice. Their observations are then aligned with a specific module in human resource management and the authors show how the principles are implemented in this case.

Whereas Royce, Stevens, Jariwala and Soehren provided an example from their home university, Liverpool John Moores University, Aurora Ricci takes the University of Bologna as a model. She returns to the pandemic as a call for renewal in The Innovation of Learning and Teaching Practices in Higher Education: A Methodological Focus on the University of Bologna’s Model. Here, she presents learner- and teacher-focused activities to face the challenge of remote learning and illustrates them with a case study and quantitative, evaluative data.

Olga Mennecke returns the focus to language learning, but the situation caused by Covid-19 is also a key factor in her considerations. As language learning is associated with a face-to-face arrangement, she discusses the factors influencing students’ motivation in her contribution, Contentualizing Students’ Motivation in Online Language Courses, and gives examples of how to deal with distance language learning.

In her contribution, New Prospects in Higher Education: Hybrid Learning Environments and Creative Teaching, Susana Gonçalves takes general reflections on societal change and the changes caused by the pandemic as a starting point to reflect on the factor of creativity in higher education and hybrid teaching.

The changes and challenges brought about by Covid-19 also play a major role in the chapters from Russia, starting with the contribution from Irina ←8 | 9→Pervukhina, Marina Vidrevich and Natalia Vlasova. Under the title Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Modern Management Technologies in Higher Education as Knowledge-Intensive Activity, the authors give a general and statistical overview of the progression of the pandemic in higher education from both the international and the Russian perspective, highlighting the impact of this situation on management, teaching and learning in universities.

Tatiana Tregubova, Irina Ainoutdinova and Vadim Kozlov present a deep insight into foreign language learning and teaching. After introducing the history and variety of methods, they pursue the Transformation from Conventional Methods to Web-based Technologies: Enhancing FLT/FLL Practices in Russian Universities, again seeing Covid-19 as an impetus. The authors discuss methods and influencing factors, and also introduce the necessary first steps for establishing efficient digital methods in foreign language teaching and learning.

The perspective in the contribution from Sergei Vasin, Konstantin Korolev, Tatiana Razuvaeva is, on the one hand, broader, as they look into general teaching and learning strategies and the systematic transformation needed to change those. But Enhancing Teaching Practice in HEIs through the Development of University Learning and Teaching Strategy is, on the other hand, a microscopic view, as the authors examine the case of Penza State University, one of the project universities.

Three contributions from China complete the volume. In Improving Teaching Practice in Higher Education from the Perspective of Learning Science, Juan Fu develops a teaching system in higher education against the background of higher education policy in China in accordance with the findings of learning psychology. New technologies in teaching, such as massive open online courses (MOOCs), are also taken into account.

Starting from the concept of respect, Tang Xueming describes the requirements for English teachers who should also provide moral education at the same time. Effective Ways of Integrating Moral Education into College English Teaching focuses on this practice at the college level.

The last contribution in the volume, The Present Situation, Dilemma and Path of Internationalization of Higher Education in the Central Region of China – Taking S University as an Example, by Qin Yuan and Yigang Peng, can be seen as a kind of project summary from a Chinese perspective. It deals with the internationalization of universities, one of the major goals of the project. The authors describe the internationalization strategies of one university against the background of regional differences in internationalization at Chinese universities.

In the end, the projects summary is differentiated. The journey changed through the course of the pandemic and the ensuing situation in still-surprising ←9 | 10→ways. Project meetings and conferences could not be held in person, but were organized through video conferences. This book, standing at the end of the project, reflects this in many ways. However, this book and the project behind it are unique in another and – at least for many of us – unexpected and sad way. The world is always changing, but in February 2022, we find it in a state in which a project like this would no longer be possible. So looking back, we cherish the experiences we had through the ENTEP journey, and we still hope that the world will change again – for the better.

←10 | 11→
Kathrin Schweiger, Beatrix Kress

Written and Oral Communication as a Didactical Tool and the Relevance of Academic Genres in the Digital Space

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to discuss the role of different forms of communication in teaching in higher education and their functions in face-to-face teaching and learning and in the digital surrounding. At the same time, the question is asked to what extent oral and written communication and academic text genres have changed due to the pandemic and/or which text genres have emerged newly through digital tools.

Keywords: Teaching and learning discourse, genre, oral and written communication, digitalization

Introduction

The pandemic-related changeover to online teaching led to a series of further training measures for university didactics. At the beginning, the question was: Which video conferencing system is best suited or, to put it more bluntly: Which system is the quickest to get to grips with and the most cost-effective and technically least susceptible to faults? In a second phase, the focus was on getting to know and using so-called tools; didactic added value was then to be derived from their applicability. At the Hildesheim University, it is primarily the department of teaching development and university didactics that deals with (digital) university continuing education programs in teaching. In the course of short presentations, the following digital tools or similar were presented in the period between 2020 and 2021: Mahara: The e-portfolio software, Powtoon animated, Sciflow: Collaborative scientific work, Digital Kanban boards, Digital pinboards Digital notebooks, Etherpad, Rocket.Chat (etc.).

During the hectic discussion about instruments, which might function under the given circumstances, actual purposes and functions of communication in higher education got somewhat out of sight. When we talk about communication we have in mind that this means more than the sheer transfer of information. Communication and especially the formed or shaped communication – shaped through the mediated transmission – is functional in itself, it is purposive through its form (cf. Ehlich 2017, p. 22). This counts even more for the communication in higher education, which is formed even more strictly. The task ←11 | 12→of information transfer is accompanied by educational goals, which contributes to the expectations on the right form. Teacher in higher education have a very certain concept of a term paper, an oral presentation, a seminar paper or even a discussion in class. Against this background, it is the more surprising that even now, after almost 20 months of online teaching, communication and its different forms play no or just a minor role in higher education didactic training. If we look at the plan and the titles of an online course on “new e-learning” at the University of Hildesheim as an example, we find a lot of lectures on tools, but almost nothing on communication:

1.Combined visualization! Application examples of tool linking from (political) teacher: inside education – Padlet, Mangatar and Co.

2.HilChat: A Campus App at Hildesheim University

3.Development of a digital platform for innovative teaching

4.Learning in three-dimensional rooms

5.etc.

Academic Communication: Written and Oral Text Genres

Looking deeper into these lectures and presentations we actually find discussions on communication – often hidden behind other terms such as “establish and maintain social presence in digital surroundings” and so on; however, the challenges and problems are not directly linked to communication itself by the speakers and participants.

Details

Pages
232
ISBN (PDF)
9783631885543
ISBN (ePUB)
9783631885550
ISBN (Hardcover)
9783631860977
DOI
10.3726/b20153
Language
English
Publication date
2022 (December)
Published
Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warszawa, Wien, 2023. 232 pp., 6 fig. col., 2 fig. b/w, 5 tables

Biographical notes

Beatrix Kress (Volume editor) Holger Kusse (Volume editor)

Beatrix Kress is professor for Intercultural Communication at Hildesheim University. She teaches and researches in the field of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. Holger Kusse works on language theory and in the field of cultural science and linguistics. He is a professor at the Institute of Slavic Studies at the TU Dresden.

Previous

Title: Enhancing Teaching Practice in Higher Education