Performance Measurement in Shared Services
Empirical Evidence from European Multinational Companies
Summary
Excerpt
Table Of Contents
- Cover
- Title
- Copyright
- About the author
- About the book
- This eBook can be cited
- Preface
- Acknowledgement
- Content overview
- Table of Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of abbreviations
- List of symbols
- 1 Introduction
- 1.1 Motivation and research questions
- 1.2 Outline of the study
- 1.3 Scientific positioning
- 2 Conceptual basis
- 2.1 Shared service organizations
- 2.1.1 Definition of shared service organizations
- 2.1.2 Objectives of shared service organizations
- 2.1.3 Design of shared service organizations
- 2.1.3.1 Functional and process scope
- 2.1.3.2 Location decisions
- 2.1.3.3 Legal and economic independence
- 2.1.3.4 Service level agreements and charging models
- 2.1.3.5 The use of IT
- 2.1.4 Conceptual distinction to centralization and outsourcing
- 2.2 Performance measurement
- 2.2.1 Definition of performance measurement
- 2.2.2 Performance measurement objectives
- 2.2.3 Design of PMS
- 2.2.3.1 Performance measures
- 2.2.3.2 Performance measurement process
- 2.2.3.3 Performance measurement actors
- 2.2.3.4 Summary
- 2.2.4 Conceptual distinction to MCS and performance management
- 2.2.4.1 Management control systems in SSOs
- 2.2.4.2 Performance management in SSOs
- 3 State of research
- 3.1 Studies on shared service organizations
- 3.1.1 Qualitative studies on shared service organizations
- 3.1.2 Quantitative studies on shared service organizations
- 3.2 Studies on performance measurement
- 3.2.1 Qualitative studies on performance measurement
- 3.2.2 Quantitative studies on performance measurement
- 3.3 Summary and research gap
- 4 Theory and basic hypotheses development
- 4.1 Theoretical foundation
- 4.1.1 Contingency theory
- 4.1.2 New institutionalism
- 4.1.2.1 Institutionalism
- 4.1.2.2 New institutional economics
- 4.1.2.3 New institutional sociology
- 4.1.3 Promotor model
- 4.1.4 Summary
- 4.2 Basic hypotheses development
- 4.2.1 Determinants of PMS design in SSOs
- 4.2.2 Effectiveness of PMS design in SSOs
- 5 Research design
- 5.1 Qualitative case study research
- 5.2 Quantitative survey research
- 5.3 Mixed methods research design
- 5.3.1 Definition of mixed methods
- 5.3.2 Objectives of a mixed methods research
- 5.3.3 Development of the mixed methods research design
- 5.3.4 Quality criteria in mixed method research
- 6 Qualitative analysis
- 6.1 Sample selection and case company description
- 6.1.1 Case company selection
- 6.1.2 Case company description
- 6.2 Data collection and analysis
- 6.2.1 Data collection
- 6.2.2 Interview characteristics
- 6.2.3 Data analysis
- 6.3 Empirical results
- 6.3.1 Within-case analysis
- 6.3.1.1 MedTechCo case
- 6.3.1.2 CommCo case
- 6.3.1.3 ChemCo case
- 6.3.1.4 PharCo case
- 6.3.1.5 AgriCo case
- 6.3.1.6 HealthCo case
- 6.3.1.7 EngineerCo case
- 6.3.2 Cross-case analysis
- 6.3.2.1 Context of PMS design in SSOs
- 6.3.2.1.1 External context
- 6.3.2.1.2 MNC context
- 6.3.2.1.3 SSO context
- 6.3.2.1.4 Summary
- 6.3.2.2 PMS design in SSOs
- 6.3.2.2.1 Performance measures
- 6.3.2.2.2 Performance measurement process
- 6.3.2.2.3 Performance measurement actors
- 6.3.2.3 Performance measurement effectiveness
- 6.3.2.4 Summary
- 6.4 Hypotheses refinement
- 6.4.1 External context
- 6.4.2 MNC context
- 6.4.3 SSO context
- 6.4.4 Performance measurement effectiveness
- 6.4.5 Summary
- 7 Quantitative analysis
- 7.1 Sample selection and data collection
- 7.1.1 Sample definition
- 7.1.2 Sample characteristics
- 7.1.3 Data collection
- 7.2 Construct measurement
- 7.2.1 Operationalization of the constructs under research
- 7.2.1.1 PMS design score
- 7.2.1.1.1 Performance measures
- 7.2.1.1.2 Performance measurement process
- 7.2.1.1.3 Performance measurement actors
- 7.2.1.2 Performance measurement effectiveness
- 7.2.2 Operationalization of the explanatory factors
- 7.2.2.1 Environmental factors
- 7.2.2.2 MNC factors
- 7.2.2.3 SSO factors
- 7.2.3 Operationalization of the control variables
- 7.3 Methods of data analysis
- 7.3.1 Descriptive statistics and mean comparisons
- 7.3.2 Multiple regression analysis
- 7.4 Empirical results
- 7.4.1 PMS design in SSOs
- 7.4.1.1 Performance measures
- 7.4.1.2 Performance measurement process
- 7.4.1.3 Performance measurement actors
- 7.4.1.4 Score aggregation and summary
- 7.4.2 Determinants of PMS design in SSOs
- 7.4.2.1 Descriptive analysis
- 7.4.2.1.1 External context
- 7.4.2.1.2 MNC context
- 7.4.2.1.3 SSO context
- 7.4.2.1.4 Summary
- 7.4.2.2 Correlation analysis
- 7.4.2.3 Regression analysis
- 7.4.3 Performance measurement effectiveness
- 7.4.3.1 Descriptive analysis
- 7.4.3.2 Regression analysis
- 7.4.4 Summary and discussion
- 7.4.4.1 Integration of the qualitative and the quantitative findings
- 7.4.4.2 Review of the results
- 8 Conclusions
- 8.1 Main findings and implications
- 8.2 Limitations and outlook
- Appendix A
- Appendix B
- Appendix C
- Bibliography
- Series index
List of figures
Figure 1.1:Research objectives of the study
Figure 1.2:Outline of the study
Figure 2.1:Definition of shared service organizations
Figure 2.2:Essential design characteristics of SSOs
Figure 2.3:Mono- and multigeographical SSCs/mono- and multidivisional SSCs
Figure 2.4:Performance as the achievement of objectives
Figure 2.6:The performance measurement process
Figure 2.7:Management control systems
Figure 3.1:Classification of the related empirical literature
Figure 4.1:Single case, universalistic and contingency approach
Figure 4.2:Application of the basic contingency model
Figure 4.3:Basic principal-agent relationship
Figure 4.5:Principal-agent relationships in SSOs.
Figure 4.6:Basic hypotheses of this study
Figure 5.1:Basic types of case study research designs
Figure 5.2:Objectives of mixed methods research
Figure 5.3:Dimensions of mixed methods research designs
Figure 5.4:This study’s mixed methods research design
Figure 5.5:Elements of quality criteria in MMR
Figure 6.2:Structuring-thematic coding
Figure 6.3:PMS design promotors in SSOs
Figure 6.4:Overview of hypotheses and underlying theories
Figure 7.1:Sample distribution by country
Figure 7.2:Sample distribution by industry
Figure 7.3:Current job title of the respondents
Figure 7.4:Feedback of non-participants
Figure 7.5:Use and proportion of measures linked to variable remuneration
Figure 7.6:The performance measurement process
Figure 7.7:MIS used for performance measure data collection
Figure 7.8:PMS reporting tools used to communicate performance measure analyses
←17 | 18→Figure 7.9:Performance measure modification frequency
Figure 7.10:Composition of the MEAS score
Figure 7.11:Composition of the PROC score
Figure 7.12:Composition of the ACT score
Figure 7.13:MNCs’ organizational structure
Figure 7.14:MNCs’ management board structure
Figure 7.15:Geographical dispersion of SSCs
Figure 7.16:Legal and economic independence of SSOs
Figure 7.17:Center concepts in SSOs
Figure 7.18:Functional configuration of SSOs
Figure 7.19:Configuration of the service provision in SSOs
Figure 7.20:Obligation to contract for internal SSO customers
Figure 7.23:SSO controlling departments in SSOs
Figure 7.24:SSO controlling tasks for SSO management accountants
Figure A.1:Interview guideline
List of tables
Table 2.1:Distinction between centralization, shared services and outsourcing
Table 3.1:Overview of qualitative studies on shared service organizations
Table 3.2:Overview of quantitative studies on shared service organizations
Table 3.3:Overview of qualitative studies on performance measurement
Table 3.4:Overview of quantitative studies on performance measurement
Table 4.1:Problems and potential solutions in principal-agent relationships
Table 6.1:Fundamental characteristics of the case companies
Table 6.2:Interview characteristics of the case companies
Table 6.3:External context of PMS design in SSOs
Table 6.4:MNC context of PMS design in SSOs
Table 6.5:SSO context of PMS design
Table 6.6:Performance measure design in SSOs
Table 6.7:Performance measurement process design in SSOs
Table 6.8:Performance measurement actors in SSOs
Table 6.9:PMS effectiveness in SSOs
Table 7.2:Fundamental characteristics of the sample firms
Table 7.3:Respondents’ characteristics
Table 7.4:Characteristics of the two questionnaires
Table 7.6:Non-response bias test for questionnaire A
Table 7.7:Non-response bias test for questionnaire B
Table 7.8:The PMS design score
Table 7.9:The performance measurement effectiveness score
Table 7.10:Performance measures in SSOs per category
Table 7.11:Performance measure development
Table 7.12:Performance measure target definition
Table 7.13:FTE allocation to performance measure data collection activities
Table 7.14:Automation of data collection by performance measure category
←19 | 20→Table 7.15:Types of performance measure analyses
Table 7.16:Reporting frequency by performance measure category
Table 7.17:Informal conversation frequency on performance measures
Table 7.18:Eliminated and added performance measures
Table 7.19:Involvement of actors in the performance measurement process
Table 7.20:Summary of the PMS design score
Table 7.21:PMS design control score
Table 7.22:Perceived environmental uncertainty
Table 7.23:Perceived competition intensity
Table 7.24:Differentiation of products and services
Table 7.25:Hierarchical structure of MNCs
Table 7.27:Number of implemented ERP-Systems
Table 7.28:IT-infrastructure heterogeneity
Table 7.29:Perceived top management support
Table 7.30:Group controlling size
Table 7.31:Collaboration intensity between SSO and group controlling
Table 7.32:SSO characteristics
Table 7.33:SSO controlling size
Table 7.34:SSO customer requirements
Table 7.35:Formal process standardization in SSOs
Table 7.36:Factual process standardization in SSOs
Table 7.37:PMS power promotors in SSOs
Table 7.38:PMS know-how promotors in SSOs
Table 7.39:PMS process promotors in SSOs
Table 7.40:PMS relationship promotors in SSOs
Table 7.41:Pearson and Spearman correlation matrix
Table 7.42:Regression analysis on determinants of PMS design
Table 7.43:Regression analysis on determinants of PMS design – subscore analysis
Table 7.44:PMS support for SSO objectives perceived by managers
Table 7.45:PMS support for SSO objectives perceived by management accountants
Table 7.46:PMS objectives and pursuance perceived by managers
Table 7.47:PMS objectives and pursuance perceived by management accountants
←20 | 21→Table 7.50:Regression analysis on performance measurement effectiveness
Table 7.51:Regression analysis on PMS effectiveness – subscore analysis MEAS
Table 7.52:Regression analysis on PMS effectiveness – subscore analysis PROC
Table 7.53:Regression analysis on PMS effectiveness – subscore analysis ACT
Table 7.54:Extended descriptive analysis on performance measurement effectiveness
Table 7.55:Diminishing marginal utility of PMS design in SSOs
List of abbreviations
ABC |
Activity based costing |
Adj. |
Adjusted |
BPO BSC |
Business Process Outsourcing Balanced Scorecard |
Cf. |
Confer |
CM CoE |
Contribution margin Center of Expertise |
Coeff. |
Coefficient |
COMP CoS |
PMS design score Center of Scale |
C.p. |
Ceteris paribus |
E.g. |
Exempli gratia |
Ed. |
Edition |
Eds. |
Editors |
ERP |
Enterprise resource planning |
Et al. |
Et alii |
Etc. |
Et cetera |
EU |
European Union |
f. |
And the following one |
ff. |
And the following |
FY |
Fiscal Year |
GDP |
Gross Domestic Product |
GOA HQ HR http |
Goal attainment score Headquarters Human Resources Hypertext Transfer Protocol |
I.a. ICS |
Inter alia Internal Control System |
I.e. |
Id est |
IMF |
International Monetary Fund |
Information Technology | |
KPI |
Key Performance Indicator |
MA MAS |
Management Accounting Management Accounting System |
Max. |
Maximum |
MCS Min. |
Management Control System Minimum |
MIS |
Management Information System |
MM MMR MMRD MNC |
Mixed methods Mixed methods research Mixed methods research design Multinational Corporation |
NIE NIS |
New Institutional Economics New Institutional Sociology |
No. |
Number |
O2C |
Order-to-cash |
OCR |
Optical Character Recognition |
p. |
Page |
P2P |
Purchase-to-pay |
PAT |
Principal Agent Theory |
PKR PMI |
Portable Document Format Prozesskostenrechnung Post-Merger Integration |
PMS |
Performance Measurement System |
pp. |
Pages |
Q |
Quarter |
QDA |
Qualitative Data Analysis |
RQ |
Research Question |
SAT SOP |
Satisfaction score Standard Operating Procedure |
SSC |
Shared Service Center |
SSO |
Shared Service Organization |
Std. Dev. |
Details
- Pages
- 436
- Publication Year
- 2021
- ISBN (PDF)
- 9783631862186
- ISBN (ePUB)
- 9783631862193
- ISBN (MOBI)
- 9783631862209
- ISBN (Hardcover)
- 9783631850459
- DOI
- 10.3726/b18738
- Language
- English
- Publication date
- 2021 (November)
- Keywords
- Kennzahlensystem KPI Management Control Measures Regression analysis Leistungsmessung Kennzahlen Survey Research Case Study Mixed Methods
- Published
- Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warszawa, Wien, 2021. 436 pp., 67 fig. b/w, 71 tables.
- Product Safety
- Peter Lang Group AG